On Monday during a live stream, DWC was hit by several Spam bots. In the process of trying to get them from the Live Chat, a comment was posted with a horrible picture as the profile picture. It was immediately removed.
However the next morning I found out that YT had removed my channel due to this incident. I have appealed to YT and asked them to return my channel.
I am not sure when or if I will be able to get DWC back. So in the meantime I will post podcasts on “Dear Woke Christian: Podcasts” and as soon as I find a reliable way I will live stream to my BMAC crowd.
Thank you all for your support and encouragement. See you soon.
Nate the Lawyer did an excellent job on this top. I summarized it below.
The Supreme Court recently made a landmark decision on affirmative action, specifically concerning the use of race in college admissions. Students for Fair Admissions sued the University of North Carolina and Harvard, questioning whether public and private colleges can continue to consider race in their admissions process.
To understand affirmative action, we need to look back at the history of racial segregation in the United States. The Supreme Court’s previous decision in Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896 allowed racial segregation under the “separate but equal” doctrine. However, in 1954, Brown v. Board of Education declared racial discrimination illegal in state schools.
After Brown v. Board of Education, black and minority students faced limited access to professional schools, like law and medical schools. To address this inequality, colleges began implementing affirmative action policies, which aimed to include black students by considering race in admissions.
The Supreme Court has made adjustments to how race can be considered in admissions over time. In 1977, in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, the Court rejected the use of race as an essential element and required schools to use race-neutral means. In 1997, in Grutter v. Bollinger, the Court ruled that race could be a factor in creating a diverse student body as a temporary fix for past discrimination.
However, in the recent Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina and Harvard case, the Supreme Court ruled that race cannot be used as a factor in college admissions. This decision effectively ended the use of affirmative action, marking a significant policy shift.
It’s important to note that some states have already banned race-based admissions. California and Texas, for example, implemented alternative policies. Texas uses the “top 10” policy, where students in the top 10 percent of their high school graduating class gain automatic admission to public universities. California saw a decrease in minority students attending elite schools but an increase in attendance at other in-state universities.
The Supreme Court’s ruling has sparked a debate on the impact of ending affirmative action. Some argue it is time to move away from using race in admissions, while others believe that minorities still face challenges and that affirmative action should continue. Notably, even some liberals have expressed support for the Court’s ruling.
In conclusion, affirmative action has evolved over the years from an essential element to a factor among criteria in admissions. However, the recent Supreme Court decision has put an end to the use of race. The effects of the ruling and the future of affirmative action remain topics of ongoing debate.
It perpetuates a negative mindset: “For as he thinks in his heart, so is he” – Proverbs 23:7a When we constantly play the victim, we allow negative thoughts and emotions to take root in our hearts, leading to a negative mindset.
It can damage relationships: “Therefore encourage one another and build one another up” – 1 Thessalonians 5:11a Playing the victim can cause strain in relationships, but encouragement and building each other up can help repair and strengthen relationships.
It can limit personal growth: “For I can do everything through Christ, who gives me strength” – Philippians 4:13 Playing the victim can cause us to feel helpless and limited in our abilities, but we can find strength in Christ to grow and develop personally.
It can lead to a lack of accountability: “So then, each of us will give an account of ourselves to God” – Romans 14:12 Playing the victim can cause us to avoid taking responsibility for our actions, but we will all be held accountable for our choices before God.
It can hinder problem-solving skills: “For God gave us a spirit not of fear but of power and love and self-control” – 2 Timothy 1:7 Playing the victim can lead to a defeatist attitude, but the power, love, and self-control given by God can help us overcome obstacles and find solutions.
It can be perceived as unattractive: “Do nothing out of selfish ambition or vain conceit. Rather, in humility value others above yourselves” – Philippians 2:3 Playing the victim can be unattractive to others, but valuing others above ourselves and showing humility can help us build healthy relationships.
It can lead to a victim mentality: “I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me” – Philippians 4:13 Playing the victim can lead to a victim mentality, but finding strength in Christ can help us overcome obstacles and avoid a defeatist attitude.
It can lower self-esteem: “For you formed my inward parts; you knitted me together in my mother’s womb. I praise you, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made” – Psalm 139:13-14a Playing the victim can lower our self-esteem, but remembering that we are fearfully and wonderfully made by God can help us see our worth and value.
It can lead to missed opportunities: “Trust in the Lord with all your heart and lean not on your own understanding; in all your ways submit to him, and he will make your paths straight” – Proverbs 3:5-6 Playing the victim can cause us to miss opportunities, but trusting in the Lord and submitting to Him can help us find the paths that lead to success and fulfillment.
It can lead to a lack of empathy: “Bear one another’s burdens, and so fulfill the law of Christ” – Galatians 6:2 Playing the victim can cause us to focus solely on our own problems, but bearing each other’s burdens and showing empathy can help us build stronger, more compassionate relationships.
Peggy McIntosh’s essay on White Privilege argues that white people benefit from a system of privilege that is often invisible to them. The author uses personal examples to illustrate how being white grants advantages in areas such as education, housing, and employment and suggests that acknowledging this privilege is the first step towards dismantling it.
As a Christian, I find this premise problematic. The idea of privileging one group of people over another goes against the biblical principle of treating all people as equals in the eyes of God. McIntosh’s argument seems to suggest that white people should feel guilty or ashamed of their skin color, which is not a healthy or productive way to approach issues of race.
Furthermore, McIntosh’s essay does not take into account the many factors that contribute to success and disadvantage in society. While it is true that being white can confer advantages in certain situations, there are many other factors that come into play, such as socioeconomic status, geographic location, and personal connections.
Finally, the concept of white privilege is not a universal truth. There are many white people who struggle with poverty, discrimination, and other forms of disadvantage. To suggest that all white people benefit from privilege is simplistic and ignores the complexity of individual experiences.
In conclusion, while Peggy McIntosh’s essay on White Privilege brings attention to important issues surrounding race and inequality, as a Christian, I find the premise problematic and oversimplified. It is important to acknowledge and address issues of systemic racism and inequality, but not at the expense of demonizing or shaming one particular group of people.
Are you someone who tends to overthink and get stuck in analysis paralysis, making it difficult to achieve your goals? If so, you’re not alone. However, there is a way to overcome this obstacle and work towards achieving success through small, incremental changes every day.
Content creation coach, Doc Rock, recommends adopting the Dave Brosford theory of marginal gains, which involves working every day to get 1% better at something. This means making small, achievable changes every day that can lead to significant progress in the long run. Whether it’s learning a new skill, improving your writing abilities, or becoming healthier, this theory can be applied to various areas in your life.
It’s important to focus on long-term progress and avoid being discouraged by the instant gratification culture we live in. Success is not achieved overnight, but rather through consistent effort and dedication over time. By breaking down your goals into small, achievable steps, you can gradually build momentum and achieve significant progress toward your goals.
For example, if your goal is to become healthier, you can start by making small changes to your diet or incorporating a daily exercise routine. As you begin to see progress, you can gradually increase the intensity or duration of your workouts or make further improvements to your diet. Over time, these small changes will add up and lead to significant progress toward your goal.
In summary, overthinking can hinder your progress toward your goals and lead to analysis paralysis. Applying the Dave Brosford theory of marginal gains can help you overcome overthinking and achieve success through small, incremental changes every day. Remember to focus on long-term progress and celebrate your progress along the way. By implementing this theory in your own life, you can gradually achieve significant results and ultimately achieve your goals.
Whether you call it “Sunday school”, “bible class”, or “expository training” Sunday school is amazing. Here are the slides from our Sunday school class.
It is true that beliefs do not necessarily equate to facts, but it is also true that facts can be believed in. For example, the fact that the Earth revolves around the sun is widely accepted because of empirical evidence and scientific research. Similarly, there is historical and archaeological evidence that supports the existence of the God of the Bible.
Keep in mind, the assertion that the Bible cannot be used as proof of its own claims is not entirely accurate. While the Bible may not be the only source of evidence, it contains historical accounts, eyewitness testimonies, and prophecies that have been fulfilled. The reliability and accuracy of these accounts have been verified through multiple sources, including non-Christian historians. So using the Bible to discuss the Bible is A-OK.
Lastly, the claim that the burden of proof lies solely with me, the person making the claim is not entirely accurate either. It is true that I am making a positive claim and have the responsibility to provide evidence to support it. However, when someone makes a negative claim, such as denying the existence of God, they also have the burden of proof to demonstrate that their claim is true. Since you came to my page to make your claim, I’ll wait for you to prove God’s non-existence.
I do understand that it is true that beliefs do not necessarily equate to facts, it is also true that facts can be believed in. The Bible contains historical and archaeological evidence that supports the existence of the God of the Bible, and denying this evidence requires one to meet the burden of proof for their negative claim.
I am so excited to share my content with you and I would be thrilled if you would take a moment to check it out. My channel is http://www.youtube.com/c/@dearwokechristian, and I put a lot of time, effort, and passion into creating videos that are both Biblically informative and entertaining.
I believe that Progressive Christianity, CRT, and BLM is a subject that is not only important but also incredibly fascinating, and I want to share my knowledge and enthusiasm for God’s word with as many people as possible. However, creating content takes a lot of time and resources, and it can be difficult to grow a channel without a dedicated audience.
That’s where you come in! If you enjoy my content, I would be incredibly grateful if you could share it with your friends and family. The more views, likes, and subscribers I have, the more motivated I will be to create even better content in the future.
I understand that your time is valuable, and I promise to make it worth your while by providing high-quality videos that are both informative and enjoyable to watch. So please, take a moment to check out my channel and let me know what you think in the comments. I would love to hear your feedback and suggestions for future videos.
Thank you so much for your support, and I hope to see you on my channel soon!
P.S. Don’t forget to subscribe to my channel to stay updated on my latest videos and join a community of like-minded individuals who share your passion for Biblical discussions.
Dear Woke Christian 